NotEntitledToYourOwnFacts.comGetting people “numb” to the idea. First, it’s a PBS staff attorney, then it’s representatives in Congress and by the time anyone knows what’s happening – “they” start carting Republican kids away… or worse. Just going to share the facts on this one. You decide. This seems to be getting a lot of publications and people are talking about it and saying, “why not?”
If The Guardian is your new source, these are the facts…
Melania’s statement says “…my heart goes out to” 4 people by name “and the Capitol Police Officers” – both by name. Then she said, “I pray for their families comfort and strength during this difficult time.” She didn’t mention they were supporters of her husband and she didn’t mention that they were incited to violence. That was all added as literary license by Martin Pengelly in New York as listed in the post.
Make no mistake, Melania is no victim. This is exactly what she said, “I am disappointed and disheartened with what happened last week. I find it shameful that surrounding these tragic events there has been salacious gossip, unwarranted personal attacks, and false misleading accusations on me – from people who are looking to be relevant and have an agenda. This time is solely about healing our country and its citizens. It should not be used for personal gain. Our Nation must heal in a civil manner. Make no mistake about it, I absolutely condemn the violence that has occurred on our Nation’s Capitol. Violence is never acceptable.” 2 How about let’s just let her words stand, rather than this Martin guy trying to obtain personal gain with his op-ed.
Mixture of truth and fiction. “Refuse to admit the reality” is what Martin seems to want us to believe. but then Martin takes it one step further “although he has conceded that he will leave office on 20 January.” Cite your sources Martin. The word “concede” has not passed the lips of Trump. You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts.
This is the report online as to what Terry Meza – Democrat from Irving, Texas has said:
To this point, I have found very little evidence to substantiate her to have actually said any of this. However, this is the response that I have found from her. But in all actuality – what she is saying here seems to be completely defensive and leaves out what her bill does remove – of which it does quite a bit – portions to be “repealed.” Her word not mine. And several key aspects of Texas Castle Law being watered down and diminished in many cases.
She continued with 2/3 and 3/3 – to finish out her thoughts.
Terry Meza appears to be upset that she is being misrepresented. So that we don’t hurt her feelings anymore, albeit truth has a tendency to do that – I have the entire Act and Terry Meza’s revisions down below. Green underlines are her adds and red strike-throughs are what she looks to remove. Note – there are entire sections that she is looking to repeal as well. Keep that in mind. Look at what the Bill she sponsored actually states: 1
Details from Texas HB 196 – https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB196/2021
Bill Title: Relating to the use of deadly force in defense of a person or property.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status:(Introduced) 2020-11-09 – Filed [HB196 Detail]
Download:Texas-2021-HB196-Introduced.html
There are several factors here to consider:
Section 1:a:2 – “is unable to safely retreat” is added – giving additional gray area to allow for prosecution, if one were to “help” another person – family or not.
Section 1:c – Is being modified from a place where person “has a right to be present at” to “person’s own habitation.”
Habitation as defined in Texas Penal Code, Title 7, Chapter 30.01:1 as
You can no longer defend where you are lawfully present, you must now be at your “own habitation” to either defend yourself, a person or property.
There is actually more to this. Robbery and aggravated robbery are also stricken from the Castle Law in this HB 196. What does that mean?
Robbery and aggravated robbery as defined in Texas Penal Code, Title 7, Chapter 29.01-03 as
Whether robbery or aggravated robbery – the robber can exhibit a deadly weapon, cause serious bodily harm and that person can place the other in fear or imminent bodily injury… and it is still the responsibility of the person who would normally lean on the castle law to defend the position of deadly force anywhere. It is only the point when someone must prevent aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, or aggravated sexual assault. But if they come into your house or any other place you are located and only intend on robbing you or commit aggravated robbery against you – even causing serious bodily injury to you which would still be prosecuted as a felony – you still must not use “deadly force.”
Remember – robbery and aggravated robbery are no longer justifications to defend property or person with deadly force, unless you are your habitation (excluding church, car, grocery store, etc) and only then if you believe something other than robbery is going to take place.
Section 4 – portions to be repealed: Sections 9:32 (b) and (d)
Repealing the ability to use deadly force for those entering your habitation, vehicle, place of business or employment. Just process that.
Continuation of modifications of Castle Law as described in HB 196.
Here is the entire Penal Code for Title 2, Chapter 9 so that you can review was is missing as well. 2
Process this and then make an informed decision. There are portions being amended, but some critical portions that are being repealed regarding Castle Law. I wanted to hit some of the high points so that everyone could be educated on the facts. Now – you decide – is this something you can support?
This is my response to her –
Appears Covid-19 has people saying one thing but doing another. Joe Biden told people to their faces – “I am going to stop fracking,” but then on like television during a debate with Trump, Biden says – “I never said no fracking. I’m just going to phase it out.” Well – Governor Gavin has announced that there are to be no gatherings with people outside of their family and no indoor gatherings especially. Sometime around 10/19/2020 the new rules for gathering were put together for California and implemented. That’s a month ago.
AP News reported that California’s Governor Gavin Newsom was “pulling the ‘Emergency Brake’ on efforts to reopen the economy, saying the state is experiencing the fastest growth in cases yet, and if left unchecked, it will lead to “catastrophic outcomes.” The move closes many nonessential indoor businesses and requires the wearing of masks outside homes, with limited exceptions.”
I’m showing the clip below, because it seems that the written word online can be modified and continues to be by various news outlets – when it doesn’t serve their agenda it seems.
On November 13th, 2020 the State of California—Health and Human Services Agency – California Department of Public Health – put out the following statement:
The rules went into effect mid-October, this was on November 16th, 2020 – but on November 6th, it appears that Gavin had a dinner with 11 other people. This is what was said…At least originally.
As of yesterday – AFTER Governor Gavin’s office specifically stated that there was a small, intimate, 12-person dinner held outdoors with family and a few friends to celebrate a 50th birthday. LA TIMES reported:
However, this picture got released which shows something very different, with Gavin being the guy on the far left, ironically enough.
California’s Gavin Newsom, the GOVERNOR of the state, who is mandating closures of businesses, minimizing gatherings for health and safety broke his very own rule of law. Either he thinks the rule is bogus or he just thinks it doesn’t apply to him. He also had his team lie about it and then gets on the media and those watching, saying that they are just squabbling over details, but he was following “The Spirit” of the mandate.
“YOU MUST FOLLOW THE SCIENCE!” is what is being yelled over and over at our society. Note the following from another news outlet “Dustin Corcoran, CEO of the California Medical Association, and Janus Norman, the group’s lobbyist and senior vice president, joined Newsom and several other guests Nov. 6 at the French Laundry, an exclusive restaurant in Napa County.” 6
More fun details on Janus Norman and the Lobbying going on in California can be found here 7https://vactruth.com/2015/11/17/lobbyists-for-sb277/[/efn_note)
Had a friend of mine yesterday let me know about how not only did he and his wife vote in person, but when they did vote, their ballots were put in a “special” envelope and was it was put off to the side. Why would someone do this. They voted at different times, one of them voted the second day of early voting and the other right near the end of early voting, several days later. However, they were both told the same thing. Both of you are registered for mail-in ballots. WHAT?!?
They both checked the site https://www.txballot.org/search and both stated that their vote was not counted. I went and checked as well. Guess what. Neither one of them were counted. His wife called the local elections office and was told, “Yes – you are both registered for mail-in voting.” When my friend asked that they get that fixed and tried to escalate the matter, she was told – “Nothing we can do about it.” & “There is no one above me.” After a several minute stand-off and no help whatsoever, my friend just said bye and hung up.
End result. Their votes for President, Representatives, Senate, Judges, etc etc – were not counted. Is it either a mistake or was it intentional. These friends of mine are against voting through mail-in ballots, so there’s that. But this is just one story of tens of thousands that are happening all over the United States.
Which now gets to to the thrust of this particular post.
When I was told of this, I went to find the website again to give to them so that they could contact Trump’s team. Here is the link, that was not readily available. Took several minutes to actually come up with it. djt45.co/stopfraud But here is what I got instead on Google.
And then –
Google has too many “more important” articles to convey, rather than just give the link for Trump’s site to shut down voter fraud once and for all. So – You make the decision yourself as to if it were fraud or not. You make a decision as to whether Google, Facebook, Twitter and so on are involved. But when you make that decision, make sure it’s a good one!
During one of the debates Trump had with Biden, Trump said
Newsweek went on to say
But here is what happened when Trump said that.
So, rather than actually taking a moment to think Trump could actually being trying to help – this lady just cancels him, mocks him and use God’s name – to tell the President of the United States – to “stop talking.”
Notice however, had he said Mexican drug lords were bringing over these kids, then Trump would have been labeled a racist again.
And it appears we have people that just read headlines and do nothing at all, with regards to research or truth. Why isn’t the first reaction of people, “That’s awful.” Kids are being torn out of the arms of kidnappers south of the border, paired up with some people that then drag them across the border and then the U.S. splits these children up from their captors and tries to get the connected back with their real parents, which is EXTREMELY difficult to do. Instead – this is what happens. No outrage for the children. Just blindly following the media narrative. Do your homework people!!! What is Trump is actually helping these kids? The media has many stirred up and totally emotional about how bad Trump is treating everyone. But – this is what we get, instead of anything good that Trump is doing to help. There are bad people that kidnap women and children. There are millions being held right now… But many are worried about Trump’s misuse of the word coyote? When in fact, it was people like these that just don’t get it.
And after this guy Mark Elliot retweets this clip we get Democrat Senator tweeting, Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Tom Perez – chairman of the DNC…
This was headline news… But what was the context of this tweet?
First – it was Mark posting this fake news and then all the Dems get on board to mock Trump and the people buy this stuff. Then Mark is chastised, because someone actually did some research and figured out that Trump’s statement was part of a greater context. Shocking news, right? This was the result.
More accurate? How about honest? At that point, millions of people had already seen it and, it’s still there in many news articles around the world.
And this is how it goes. Time after time after time. Fake news, people follow it. When someone does real research it gets retracted and otherwise, it doesn’t. And so people think what they do about Trump for what???
Got a tip about this from the police department, near Ft. Worth, Texas on 11/8/2020, regarding the need to research both terms, Hammer & Scorecard. So, here goes – from Lt. General Thomas G. McInerney, USAF (ret) himself, what he suggested was to come, prior to the election – regarding potential election fraud.
As I collect more information that is relevant to this subject, it will be added to this post.
This video was removed from Youtube.com due to “not being appropriate” – I received a warning. This would be called censorship.
General McInerney comments after the election and evivences pointing to potential voter fraud.
2020/11/9 – opened up my first Twitter account. Based on nothing, this is what they suggested I might be interested in:
Page 2
During Trump’s second debate with Biden and first time moderator with Kristen Welker, Trump responds to a question Kristen asks with the following statement.
Here is Trump’s response:
Did Trump make a mistake by allegedly retweeting a man yelling white power to a group of BLM protesters?
These protesters were yelling profanities, held signs that Trump supporters were Nazi’s, Hitler followers, Bigots, Racists, White Trash and then sworn at, being called @*%#ing Nazis and Racist Pigs. But in this montage of clips, there one a Retired Veteran Trump supporter responding to hate with “white power” which as quite dumb. He was being harassed and was called a racist among other things and did not respond well to that. Very poor response to the bigotry and hate of the anti-Trump/BLM protesters.
I’ve included the video without CNN spinning what actually is recorded. Just listen for yourself. 2
Trump should have checked that better. He did make a mistake retweeting the statement that guy made. It shouldn’t have included that statement of “white power.” But I wonder. Just because Trump retweeted something, does that mean that the source couldn’t have been altered? We don’t really concern ourselves with those questions as a society today, do we. Either way, we’ll never know.
Assigning power to Whites is no good. But there appears to be a movement from BLM that suggests that there should be an assignment of power to Blacks. Why assign power to either White or Black? Can we be honest for a minute… What is this?
And another instance of cussing at just random people, proudly flipping the bird or some other sign at these people, because they won’t raise their hand to symbolize “Black Power.” I really don’t think we should be supporting either White or Black Power. Let’s support unity, but not at the tip of a sword, held by a mob that cusses and screams at you and then on many occasions, leads to unwelcome physical results.
Just be honest with yourself here. Do you think anyone should be raising their fists up saying “POWER” of any kind? Just asking.
“This is a war, guys … We’re getting ready to get armored up around here,” declared Letha Winston, whose son, Patrick Kimmons, was shot dead by cops in 2018 as he charged toward them seconds after he shot two men.
“I will continue with my mission by any means necessary,” she added — repeating “by any means necessary” several times as she spoke for more than an hour Sunday in front of the Oregon city’s Justice Center.
Enlarge ImageA Portland BLM activist told other militants that cops should “fry like burnt bacon.”
A Portland BLM activist told other militants that cops should “fry like burnt bacon.”Twitter
“I know you got a gun, but so do I … Go ahead and shoot me — I’m shooting back,” she told the cheering crowd, addressing them as “comrades.” 5
Here are the videos showing the son who was shot, AFTER, shooting two other people and was trying to flee and ultimately ran directly towards the two police officers that shot him in self-defense.
Adding to Youtube..