John Sullivan himself has video and says that he was at the Capitol riot in D.C..
When he was asked if he was a member of antifa, as he has used the hashtag in his social media posts, Sullivan said he understands where there could be confusion.
“If people are saying I’m antifa, as far as a terrorist organization, I’m not,” he said. “Am I anti-fascist? We all are anti-fascist. And that’s what we should all strive for being. I have my own organization, Insurgence USA, and that’s what it is for. That’s really what it is.” 1
“Gaetz, other Republicans baselessly claim Antifa was involved” – CNBC2
FBI says “No indication” that antifa took part in U.S. Capitol riot – CNBC 3
Place the blame where it belongs. Trump’s rabid supporters, not antifa, stormed the Capitol. – Suzette Hackney – USA TODAY 4
Scoop: Trump falsely blames Antifa for Capitol insurrection 5
The media goes on and on and on with the same narrative. NO ANTIFA. ALL TRUMP’S INCITEMENT.
Is this true??? I think we need to define Antifa before we can really evaluate these assertions.
Quick Google search on “What is Antifa?” and this is one of the top listings today.
This is what most media is reporting – that Antifa is a “loose network of demonstrators to counter fascism and racism…”
Enter John Sullivan…
[John Sullivan]A Utah activist who faces criminal charges in connection with a Provo protest he organized in June said he attended a pro-Trump rally that turned into a violent attack on the U.S. Capitol in order to see “the truth” about the protests for himself and the organization he represents.
The article continues on…
Sullivan, who is the founder of Insurgence USA, a social justice group that calls itself ANTI-FASCIST and protests police brutality, was detained by Washington police for about an hour and a half Thursday night, a day after he talked to local and national media about what he witnessed Wednesday.
We just heard from John’s site itself that says “Anti-Fascist” but not AntiFA. So, here is what the actual word Antifa means, by another Google search:
John Sullivan says he was there and had video of Ashli Babbitt who was killed in the incident.
After making his way inside the Capitol during the riot, Sullivan said he witnessed the shooting death of protester Ashli Babbitt, and the Twitter account for Insurgence USA retweeted video from someone with Sullivan that shows the shooting and the aftermath.
“I have video of it,” he said, describing in detail seeing the flash of the gun, the bullet strike Babbitt, and Babbitt’s reaction as she died there on the floor. “I am hesitant to post it. … It’s something I have to take in. I hope that people get a grasp of that situation. Whoever shot her, maybe should be held accountable. I guess that’s up to the law to decide.”
He claims Babbitt was the first one to try and get inside what he believes was the House chamber.
John was there. He was near the frontline of this ordeal, by his own account.
Throughout the video Sullivan can be heard telling police that they shouldn’t try to stop them from going different places because he doesn’t want them to get hurt. He appears to take his gas mask off at one point, but he is not shown in his own video except for a few seconds of an 18-minute video that has now been removed from his social media accounts.
As we started with, John himself states that he is “anti-fascist.” but there is more to it.
On Friday, Sullivan acknowledged that he was afraid at some points, but he denies trying to incite violence. In fact, he insists he was only trying to diffuse situations he saw as potentially volatile.
BUT…
Sullivan, 26, faces two criminal charges stemming from a protest he organized in Provo last June.
Charging documents say Sullivan recorded several hours of the protest and is seen in the recordings “kicking vehicles and threatening drivers” and directing protesters to block intersections. During that protest, a Provo man, 60, was shot in the elbow after protesters blocked his vehicle. Sullivan later admitted to police that he knew who the gunman was but failed to report it to authorities, according to the charges.
Let’s just end with this and you be the judge.
But some of the 40-minute video he posted to his social media sites contradicts his assertion that he and another woman were “only filming” the actions and not participating as he can be heard in the video encouraging people to join them as they push their way through police barricades.
When asked about some of the things he said during the 40-minute video, he said, “When you’re in a massive crowd like that, you have to blend in.” – John Sullivan – Insurgence USA – #Antifa
Getting people “numb” to the idea. First, it’s a PBS staff attorney, then it’s representatives in Congress and by the time anyone knows what’s happening – “they” start carting Republican kids away… or worse. Just going to share the facts on this one. You decide. This seems to be getting a lot of publications and people are talking about it and saying, “why not?”
If The Guardian is your new source, these are the facts…
Melania Trump broke her silence on the attack on the Capitol on Monday – to issue a statement saying that she honored all those who died, including four supporters of her husband, who incited the mob to violent action. 1
Melania’s statement says “…my heart goes out to” 4 people by name “and the Capitol Police Officers” – both by name. Then she said, “I pray for their families comfort and strength during this difficult time.” She didn’t mention they were supporters of her husband and she didn’t mention that they were incited to violence. That was all added as literary license by Martin Pengelly in New York as listed in the post.
…she also used the opportunity to portray herself as a victim, saying the shocking and violent attack on one of the hearts of American democracy had led to “salacious gossip, unwarranted personal attacks and false misleading accusations” about her.
Make no mistake, Melania is no victim. This is exactly what she said, “I am disappointed and disheartened with what happened last week. I find it shameful that surrounding these tragic events there has been salacious gossip, unwarranted personal attacks, and false misleading accusations on me – from people who are looking to be relevant and have an agenda. This time is solely about healing our country and its citizens. It should not be used for personal gain. Our Nation must heal in a civil manner. Make no mistake about it, I absolutely condemn the violence that has occurred on our Nation’s Capitol. Violence is never acceptable.” 2 How about let’s just let her words stand, rather than this Martin guy trying to obtain personal gain with his op-ed.
Donald Trump continues to refuse to admit the reality of his electoral defeat by Joe Biden, although he has conceded that he will leave office on 20 January.
Mixture of truth and fiction. “Refuse to admit the reality” is what Martin seems to want us to believe. but then Martin takes it one step further “although he has conceded that he will leave office on 20 January.” Cite your sources Martin. The word “concede” has not passed the lips of Trump. You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts.
This is the report online as to what Terry Meza – Democrat from Irving, Texas has said:
In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state’s “castle doctrine.” This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home. Now listen to what she has to say… “I’m not saying that stealing is okay,” Meza explained. “All I’m saying is that it doesn’t warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed.” Meza was quick to reassure that her bill “would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves. Under the new law the homeowner’s obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner’s responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner.” “In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does,” Meza reasoned. “The homeowner’s insurance we reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better.”
To this point, I have found very little evidence to substantiate her to have actually said any of this. However, this is the response that I have found from her. But in all actuality – what she is saying here seems to be completely defensive and leaves out what her bill does remove – of which it does quite a bit – portions to be “repealed.” Her word not mine. And several key aspects of Texas Castle Law being watered down and diminished in many cases.
She continued with 2/3 and 3/3 – to finish out her thoughts.
Terry Meza appears to be upset that she is being misrepresented. So that we don’t hurt her feelings anymore, albeit truth has a tendency to do that – I have the entire Act and Terry Meza’s revisions down below. Green underlines are her adds and red strike-throughs are what she looks to remove. Note – there are entire sections that she is looking to repeal as well. Keep that in mind. Look at what the Bill she sponsored actually states: 1
Details from Texas HB 196 – https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB196/2021
Bill Title: Relating to the use of deadly force in defense of a person or property. Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0) Status:(Introduced) 2020-11-09 – Filed [HB196 Detail] Download:Texas-2021-HB196-Introduced.html
There are several factors here to consider:
Section 1:a:2 – “is unable to safely retreat” is added – giving additional gray area to allow for prosecution, if one were to “help” another person – family or not. Section 1:c – Is being modified from a place where person “has a right to be present at” to “person’s own habitation.”
Habitation as defined in Texas Penal Code, Title 7, Chapter 30.01:1 as
Whether robbery or aggravated robbery – the robber can exhibit a deadly weapon, cause serious bodily harm and that person can place the other in fear or imminent bodily injury… and it is still the responsibility of the person who would normally lean on the castle law to defend the position of deadly force anywhere. It is only the point when someone must prevent aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, or aggravated sexual assault. But if they come into your house or any other place you are located and only intend on robbing you or commit aggravated robbery against you – even causing serious bodily injury to you which would still be prosecuted as a felony – you still must not use “deadly force.”
Remember – robbery and aggravated robbery are no longer justifications to defend property or person with deadly force, unless you are your habitation (excluding church, car, grocery store, etc) and only then if you believe something other than robbery is going to take place.
Section 4 – portions to be repealed: Sections 9:32 (b) and (d)
Repealing the ability to use deadly force for those entering your habitation, vehicle, place of business or employment. Just process that.
Continuation of modifications of Castle Law as described in HB 196.
Here is the entire Penal Code for Title 2, Chapter 9 so that you can review was is missing as well. 2
Process this and then make an informed decision. There are portions being amended, but some critical portions that are being repealed regarding Castle Law. I wanted to hit some of the high points so that everyone could be educated on the facts. Now – you decide – is this something you can support?
Appears Covid-19 has people saying one thing but doing another. Joe Biden told people to their faces – “I am going to stop fracking,” but then on like television during a debate with Trump, Biden says – “I never said no fracking. I’m just going to phase it out.” Well – Governor Gavin has announced that there are to be no gatherings with people outside of their family and no indoor gatherings especially. Sometime around 10/19/2020 the new rules for gathering were put together for California and implemented. That’s a month ago.
AP News reported that California’s Governor Gavin Newsom was “pulling the ‘Emergency Brake’ on efforts to reopen the economy, saying the state is experiencing the fastest growth in cases yet, and if left unchecked, it will lead to “catastrophic outcomes.” The move closes many nonessential indoor businesses and requires the wearing of masks outside homes, with limited exceptions.”
I’m showing the clip below, because it seems that the written word online can be modified and continues to be by various news outlets – when it doesn’t serve their agenda it seems.
Governors ratchet up restrictions ahead of Thanksgiving By DAVID EGGERT and RACHEL LA CORTE – November 16, 2020 2
On November 13th, 2020 the State of California—Health and Human Services Agency – California Department of Public Health – put out the following statement:
This guidance provides an updated plan for Californians to gather outside their household and replaces the March 16, 2020, October 9, 2020 and other prior gatherings guidance. It applies to private gatherings, and all other gatherings not covered by existing sector guidance are prohibited. It also applies to activities protected by the First Amendment to the extent that they are not already permitted by other guidance, notwithstanding any guidance, orders, or directives to the contrary. Gatherings are defined as social situations that bring together people from different households at the same time in a single space or place. When people from different households mix, this increases the risk of transmission of COVID-19. 3
The rules went into effect mid-October, this was on November 16th, 2020 – but on November 6th, it appears that Gavin had a dinner with 11 other people. This is what was said…At least originally.
As of yesterday – AFTER Governor Gavin’s office specifically stated that there was a small, intimate, 12-person dinner held outdoors with family and a few friends to celebrate a 50th birthday. LA TIMES reported:
However, this picture got released which shows something very different, with Gavin being the guy on the far left, ironically enough.
On 11/18/2020 Tucker Carlson reported on an indoor dinner Governor Gavin Newsome had with 11 of his closest friends – or should I say lobbyists/medical physician oversight. 5
California’s Gavin Newsom, the GOVERNOR of the state, who is mandating closures of businesses, minimizing gatherings for health and safety broke his very own rule of law. Either he thinks the rule is bogus or he just thinks it doesn’t apply to him. He also had his team lie about it and then gets on the media and those watching, saying that they are just squabbling over details, but he was following “The Spirit” of the mandate.
“YOU MUST FOLLOW THE SCIENCE!” is what is being yelled over and over at our society. Note the following from another news outlet “Dustin Corcoran, CEO of the California Medical Association, and Janus Norman, the group’s lobbyist and senior vice president, joined Newsom and several other guests Nov. 6 at the French Laundry, an exclusive restaurant in Napa County.” 6https://www.cmadocs.org/staff/dustin-corcoranhttps://www.cmadocs.org/staff/janus-norman
More fun details on Janus Norman and the Lobbying going on in California can be found here 7https://vactruth.com/2015/11/17/lobbyists-for-sb277/[/efn_note)
Had a friend of mine yesterday let me know about how not only did he and his wife vote in person, but when they did vote, their ballots were put in a “special” envelope and was it was put off to the side. Why would someone do this. They voted at different times, one of them voted the second day of early voting and the other right near the end of early voting, several days later. However, they were both told the same thing. Both of you are registered for mail-in ballots. WHAT?!?
They both checked the site https://www.txballot.org/search and both stated that their vote was not counted. I went and checked as well. Guess what. Neither one of them were counted. His wife called the local elections office and was told, “Yes – you are both registered for mail-in voting.” When my friend asked that they get that fixed and tried to escalate the matter, she was told – “Nothing we can do about it.” & “There is no one above me.” After a several minute stand-off and no help whatsoever, my friend just said bye and hung up.
End result. Their votes for President, Representatives, Senate, Judges, etc etc – were not counted. Is it either a mistake or was it intentional. These friends of mine are against voting through mail-in ballots, so there’s that. But this is just one story of tens of thousands that are happening all over the United States.
Which now gets to to the thrust of this particular post.
When I was told of this, I went to find the website again to give to them so that they could contact Trump’s team. Here is the link, that was not readily available. Took several minutes to actually come up with it. djt45.co/stopfraud But here is what I got instead on Google.
TikTok trend forces Trump campaign’s ‘voter fraud hotline’ to close after it is inundated with prank calls 1
Trump campaign voter fraud hotline flooded with prank calls 2
Trump’s Voter Fraud Claims Are Now Being Debunked by His Own Government 3
Trump campaign shuts down ‘voter fraud’ hotline after it’s flooded with prank calls 4
And then –
Voter fraud is real, just not on the scale claimed by Trump 5
Google has too many “more important” articles to convey, rather than just give the link for Trump’s site to shut down voter fraud once and for all. So – You make the decision yourself as to if it were fraud or not. You make a decision as to whether Google, Facebook, Twitter and so on are involved. But when you make that decision, make sure it’s a good one!
During one of the debates Trump had with Biden, Trump said
These children are brought here by coyotes and lots of bad people, cartels, and they used to use them to get into our country.1https://www.newsweek.com/trump-debate-coyotes-1541726[/efn_noet]
Newsweek went on to say
“Coyote” is actually a common term used for human smugglers along the U.S.-Mexico border.
But here is what happened when Trump said that.
So, rather than actually taking a moment to think Trump could actually being trying to help – this lady just cancels him, mocks him and use God’s name – to tell the President of the United States – to “stop talking.”
Notice however, had he said Mexican drug lords were bringing over these kids, then Trump would have been labeled a racist again.
And it appears we have people that just read headlines and do nothing at all, with regards to research or truth. Why isn’t the first reaction of people, “That’s awful.” Kids are being torn out of the arms of kidnappers south of the border, paired up with some people that then drag them across the border and then the U.S. splits these children up from their captors and tries to get the connected back with their real parents, which is EXTREMELY difficult to do. Instead – this is what happens. No outrage for the children. Just blindly following the media narrative. Do your homework people!!! What is Trump is actually helping these kids? The media has many stirred up and totally emotional about how bad Trump is treating everyone. But – this is what we get, instead of anything good that Trump is doing to help. There are bad people that kidnap women and children. There are millions being held right now… But many are worried about Trump’s misuse of the word coyote? When in fact, it was people like these that just don’t get it.
And after this guy Mark Elliot retweets this clip we get Democrat Senator tweeting, Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Tom Perez – chairman of the DNC…
This was headline news… But what was the context of this tweet?
First – it was Mark posting this fake news and then all the Dems get on board to mock Trump and the people buy this stuff. Then Mark is chastised, because someone actually did some research and figured out that Trump’s statement was part of a greater context. Shocking news, right? This was the result.
More accurate? How about honest? At that point, millions of people had already seen it and, it’s still there in many news articles around the world.
And this is how it goes. Time after time after time. Fake news, people follow it. When someone does real research it gets retracted and otherwise, it doesn’t. And so people think what they do about Trump for what???
Got a tip about this from the police department, near Ft. Worth, Texas on 11/8/2020, regarding the need to research both terms, Hammer & Scorecard. So, here goes – from Lt. General Thomas G. McInerney, USAF (ret) himself, what he suggested was to come, prior to the election – regarding potential election fraud.
As I collect more information that is relevant to this subject, it will be added to this post.
